Thursday, October 26, 2006

The Real Evil ...

(abridged edition)

Is that devil loathsome fear.

In our horror at the prospect of a triple-X porn store in our midst, we fail to venture forth to even imagine better solutions for an increasingly common problem: how to protect the free flow of expression and ideas, on the one hand, and women and children and the integrity of neighborhoods, on the other hand. Didn’t one of the greatest leaders in our history once declare, “We have nothing to fear, but fear itself!”

A hip-hop club and bar could not be stopped from doing business at 135 King Street and utilizing the entire 6,000 square feet based upon the assumption that its content alone causes bad secondary effects, but many justifiably claim adult establishments can be.

This is so because the Supreme Court’s City of Renton opinion (written by the same justice that would uphold laws criminalizing homosexuality) says that bad secondary effects flow from the pornographic content of an adult establishment inevitably as light from the sun.

The truth is that the content of adult establishments do not cause secondary effects anymore than hip-hop music in clubs and bars. What really makes the difference is how adult establishments and hip-hop clubs and bars are managed and operated.

Nonetheless, many of us seem all too eager to zone adult establishments out of town based upon the content of the materials they sell, alone. Just because the Supreme Court states that a law is constitutional does not make it right. The Supreme Court upheld “separate but equal” laws for decades.

The City’s Memorandum to the City Council justifying the zoning proposal states that the issue here is size. But this is not a big box issue; Cap Video has no plans to expand the size of the existing structure, which really is no larger, and may be smaller, than many establishments nearby.

A far smaller triple-X porn store at 135 King Street, however, would still be allowed. So, what does the zoning law and other proposals accomplish? Not much really unless they become the first step of a progressively more repressive agenda. As one leading council member stated in the last city council meeting, “We should not stop now.”

If history is to be consulted as our guide, yes, no doubt, these measures will be the first step. The tyranny of the majority in a democracy never successfully starts out looking like what it is. It begins by preying upon the people’s most noble sentiments to protect what the public believes to be most vulnerable, be it women and children, public morality and decency, the integrity of neighborhoods, or our sacred “American way of life.”

The goal will become banishing a certain type of adult content entirely because implies that certain types of offensive and harmful sexual conduct should be tolerated, if not accepted and celebrated. But the second step shall be merely to put all of our pornography in places where pedestrian residents and customers of downtown Northampton are highly unlikely to travel, and thus be less likely to consider the merits of its “bad” message for themselves. Oh my …!

Dear City Citizens and Council Members please be free to counter with speech and ideas the speech and ideas that you find offensive and harmful, but by making it far less likely for pedestrians like me to incidentally consider certain ideas and expression, you now embark upon censorship of ideas and expression based upon what you alone deem to be without merit. No, I should have the right to judge for myself, thank you.

Moreover, as a practical matter, enactment of the pending zoning ordinances will no doubt sooner or later prompt litigation by Cap Video or another adult retail vendor intent upon expanding into our community. These measures in practice prove most successful with respect to spawning litigation that makes lawyers, like me, rich.

I say, let’s put off the proposed zoning ordinance until the parties have exhausted themselves on negotiations. After all, what’s the rush? Adult establishments are not grandfathered – protected from subsequent zoning by the City – under Massachusetts law.

With all of the diversity of opinion in America there are few things that we, the people, including pornographers, seem to agree upon, aside from opposing taxation without representation and making lawyers rich for no good purpose.

And there lies the common ground from which the City and Cap Video can begin to negotiate a solution that addresses their respective concerns and interests.

The City could begin, as I have suggested before in The Real Challenge, by asking Cap Video to comply with a licensing scheme similar in certain respects to the licensing scheme applied to bars. It could also ask if Cap Video would invest in that area of King Street in a manner that would advance the City’s hopes and dreams for that area.

If Cap Video had a vested interest in protecting, if not improving upon, the quality of life in the same neighborhood, it would be far less likely to tolerate a drop in the quality of life and the irresponsible management of its adult establishment located in the very same area. But, to my knowledge, the City leaders have not engaged Cap Video in a discussion of this nature.

John Lennon once wrote the song, “Imagine,” expressing for an entire generation our inner most desires. Yes, with all the intellect and creativity we have to draw upon, imagine the difference we can make here and now, just by refusing to repeat the same old litigious insanity … Yes, sweet Northampton, Imagine. For with respect to that effort, at least, I say we have nothing to fear, but fear itself.

Yours/AC

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Peter, I regret the slight inconvenience to your ability to purchase porn that adult-use zoning represents. However, you have no right to subject my neighborhood to excessive physical risks, risks documented at NoPornNorthampton.org.

I'm not sure exactly which "negotiations" you're referring to, but based on Anthony Nota's community relations skills on display at yesterday's Planning Board meeting, I'm less convinced than ever that Capital Video cares about the quality of life in Northampton. Legislation is indeed appropriate here, and the courts agree.

Anonymous said...

Sigh. Excessive physical risks? Documented? I'm still waiting for the statistics on how crime goes up when Capital Video comes to town. Not Des Moines, not Minneapolis, but cities where Capital Video comes to town.

By the way, yesterday you talked about Springfield. I trust you saw the report that crime is down in Springfield for the first 10 months of this year? Could it be that secondary effects can be mitigated by police and community involvement?

Always Controversial said...

"Peter, I regret the slight inconvenience to your ability to purchase porn that adult-use zoning represents."

Adam, you totally miss the point. I didn't refer to my inconvience. Read the thing again.

As for inconvenience, hey, let's zone everthing you want to sell and read to a few remote places, where there may not be anyone ready and willing to lease space to you, and then see if it is merely a slight inconvenience.

"However, you have no right to subject my neighborhood to excessive physical risks, risks documented at PornNorthampton.org."

ITS NOT JUST YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD! Its mine, too. Stop talking like you own the place and you speak for all the people who live there. You don't.

Others in the neighboorhood also are not as troubled by the prospect of a Cap Vid store there as you, and they are not only the mopornorthampton people who tell me this. But you sure have scared these other people from going public with their views. And you talk about being intimidated? Look what you have done in that department ...

"I'm not sure exactly which "negotiations" you're referring to,"

Ah, Adam, most parties with conflicting interest usually try to sit down and solve their differences before restoring to the court or taking action likely to prompt the other party from going to court.

To my knowledge, the City has not said to Cap Vid, "Come, we have concerns, please visit us and discuss them with us and see if we can't work things out." Instead, they have been reportedly stonewalling Cap Video like they did last night.

"Tony Nota's community relations skills on display at yesterday's Planning Board meeting, I'm less convinced than ever that Capital Video cares about the quality of life in Northampton." What? the board jerked him off and then you had to rub it in. What about your community relation skills?

"Legislation is indeed appropriate here, and the courts agree." No, not all courts agree, even the Supreme Court has "refined" the law as set forth in Renton. The law is evolving as you see in our next post.

Or may be you will just do into denial, as you have with respect to the porn zoning in NYC not even being enforced?

Anonymous said...

"The reality is they will continue to sell violent, misogynistic porn that celebrates infidelity."

So now we get to the real issue. There are people in the world who don't use porn. They don't use toys or props. Hell, they may not even use lube or condoms (in which case they should be given a severe flogging).

My answer to this? DON'T GO TO A FRIKKIN' PORN STORE!!!!

If your belief is that porn is inherently misogynistic and violent, then perhaps you should be targeting the porn industry itself. But if the only titles you are looking at are: "World of Black Bondage", "Office Slut Gangbang", "Use Em' Abuse Em' and Lose Em' #9" (quoted from the nopornnorthampton site) it's going to be impossible for you to make a fair judgement.

Yes, a great deal of porn is based on power play scenes. But it's not all about men using women. There are dykes, fags, trannies, little people, group acts, solo acts.... the list goes on. And if you believe that BDSM is abusive and non-consensual than you have a lot of self-educating to do.

"Porn store" owners sell myriads of items. Some of this is porn. But much of what they sell is adventure- for singles, for couples, for triads, etc. Safer sex materials do not frighten me, nor do dildos, buttplugs, costumes, blindfolds, handcuffs.... These are things which help enhance peoples sex lives.

But let's just say for a moment that the idea of BDSM scares me. Let's say that I believe that a store with BDSM material will only inspire rapists to run amok. Would a commercial porn store be first on my list of places to protest? Most likely not.

I would be going after the smaller places- the places which specialize in providing their customers with implements of doom. I'd demand the local leather store be closed, that adult stores selling floggers which were handcrafted by a local woman be righteously struck down. I'd be demanding that the local hardware store remove any and all products which might be used to tie or clamp anything. I would not be wasting my time on a commercial store which, despite its best intentions, will probably never carry anything sufficiently novel enough to write home about.

This is a debate I've had many many times over the years, and it never gets any less irritating. People are animals. Animals have sexual urges and desires. Is satisfying that urge on your own or with a consenting partner or partners really that terrifying? What is so scary about a business which caters to the sexual needs of adults?

Or are you scared that you might be lured inside while taking your evening stroll to peruse the french maid costumes and rubber c***s? Yeah, that seems the most likely explanation.

Anonymous said...

Your opinions on this topic are just completely ridiculous. Choke on some porn and die you clueless, mysognist asshole.